Consumer (f.)
Incapable of consumption itself, society assigns
the role of “consumed consumer” to women in
three areas, as Vilém Flusser explains in his
eponymous article “A Consumidora Consumida”
[The Female Consumed Consumer] (in:
Comentário, vol. 13, no. 51, 1972): in consuming
cultural products; in accepting herself as both
cultural object and product; in the consumption
of men. Women, characterized by “concavity”
and subjected to a project of a masculine culture,
would only be able to act out their femininity
if there were an archaeological revolution.
Until the Paleolithic, produced goods were consumed
completely, and culture was an increasing
collection of values and forms. Today’s society,
which is incapable of collecting values and forms
and of eliminating the used ones, produces inconsumable
waste. This place is the place of rubbish.
The culture buried by the rubbish is content with
just two types of past: one superficial layer (historical,
taken over, and accepted past) and layers
obliterated by rubbish (refused, consumed, and
restricted past, the subject matter of archaeology).
The feminine point of view – inaccessible
since the second catastrophe (civilization) because
of the layers of rubbish – can only be liberated
by archaeology. The feminine revolution
would need to reach the reality of femininity,
which has been buried beneath the consumption
and the conditioning, in order to animate
and evaluate it.
If this revolution were successful, culture (marked by circularity, and no longer by linearity and progress) would not be historical or productive. Culture would not culminate in a consumer society, because from a feminine standpoint the difference between production and consumption is ambivalent. Perhaps culture might save us from the holes covered with rubbish that are the result of the male drive to “convexity” that fills up female “concavity,” which implies the role of women is to be objects (rubbish bins). We would be saved from death, and women would be both consumers and liberators. However, the paradox would remain: being liberated means being consumed.
Original article by Adriana Gurgel in Flusseriana